Mohandas Gandhi`s Use of Nonviolent Methods to Achieve...

The mission of Gandhi’s life was to help the people of India free themselves from British rule. Many people have struggled for independence. They have fought bloody battles or used terrorism in an attempt to achieve their goals. Gandhi’s revolution was different. He succeeded as an independence leader with the use of nonviolent methods. The young Mohandas Gandhi did not seem as a boy that would become a great leader. He changed as he studied in Britain and practiced in South Africa. He fought for the rights of Indians in both South Africa and India. Gandhi believed that all people in the world are brothers and sisters. He didn’t hate the English. Actually, he saw a lot that was good about them. His nonviolent means of revolution†¦show more content†¦He once stole gold from his brother and wrote an apology letter that touched his father’s heart. His father did not punish, but embraced him. This made Mohandas realize that truth and love had power. After his father passed away, he went to England to study law. He went under three conditions of his mother: not to touch meat, alcohol, and women. He had a difficult time. He did not fit in with the British. He changed himself by wearing more modern clothes and taking classes such as dance. He found a society that was vegetarian and joined. He also found a vegetarian restaurant and had his first full meal since he arrived. He finished school and his exams. He then returned to India and realized that he had studied law, but had not learned how to practice it. He did not have knowledge about Indian law and worse of all, lacked ability to speak in public. He wasn’t able to speak in his first court case. Gandhi took an offer to work for a firm in South Africa. The firm needed someone with the knowledge of English language and law to represent them for a year. He went to South Africa and while he was riding on the train, a white man entered the first-class compartment in which Gandhi was sitting in and looked at him then left. He returned with two officials who told him to go to the third-class car. Gandhi claimed he had a first-class ticket and refused to leave. Indians weren’t supposed to be in the first-class area and Gandhi had to be thrown off.Show MoreRelatedMartin Luther King And Malcolm X Essay882 Words   |  4 PagesMartin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X were two freedom fighters who shared the same goal, which was freedom, justice and equality, but differed in their methods. Martin Luther King, Jr. meeting Malcolm X in the U.S. Capitol, 1964., 2017 Radical reform made sense to King while rejection and revolutionary rage made more sense to to Malcolm X (Waldschmidt-Nelson and Waldschmidt-Nelson, 2012). Dr. King was a Baptist minister who believed in the equality of all people beforeRead MoreMahatma Gandhi : The Hero Of The Indian Independence Struggle1723 Words   |  7 PagesMahatma Gandhi, the hero of the Indian Independence struggle, was the architect of a form of non-violent civil disobedience that would influence the world. Mahatma Gandhi studied both law and religion and advocated for the civil rights of Indians, both at home under British rule and in South Africa. Gandhi became a leader of India’s independence movement, organizing boycotts against British institutions in peaceful forms of civil disobedience Born on October 2, 1869, in Porbandar, India, Gandhi grewRead MoreComparison of Civil Disobedience Essay3692 Words   |  15 PagesComparing the Civil Disobedience of Martin Luther King Jr., Henry David Thoreau, and Mohandas Gandhi   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  From the onset of man fighting for freedom or his beliefs, the question has always been whether one person can make a difference using words rather than wars. Philosophically, the concept of civil disobedience would appear to be an ineffective weapon against political injustice; history however has proven it to repeatedly be one of the most powerful weapons of the common man. Martin LutherRead MoreWhen Is Work For Rule Effective? Essay2359 Words   |  10 Pagesof a difficult or unreasonable supervisor who keeps pressuring you to work overtime or do something that you aren’t comfortable with, you (the employee) can apply the work to rule to get your point across. Being that work to rule would be used as a method of influencing negotiations without going on strike. What employees do is cover just their duties but do nothing on their own ingenuity Work to rule is also effective when workers do this collectively, being that it is a call for workers to governRead MoreA Comparison Between Booker T. Washington (19th century) and Martin Luther King Jr. (20th century)5383 Words   |  22 PagesMartin Luther King, Jr. -- prime mover of the Montgomery bus boycott, keynote speaker at the March on Washington, youngest Nobel Peace Prize laureate. But in retrospect, single events are less important than the fact that King, and his policy of nonviolent protest, was the dominant force in the civil rights movement during its decade of greatest achievement, from 1957 to 1968. II.BOOKER T. WASHINGTON A. HISTORY Booker T. Washington was born a slave in Hales Ford, Virginia, reportedly on AprilRead MoreOne Significant Change That Has Occurred in the World Between 1900 and 2005. Explain the Impact This Change Has Made on Our Lives and Why It Is an Important Change.163893 Words   |  656 Pageshumans vastly exceeded that of any previous era in history. In a century where human communities globally and individuals locally had the potential to be much more intensely connected by new communications technologies, state-sponsored programs to achieve autarky, a global epidemic of ethnic strife, uncontrolled urban growth, and the dissolution of extended family ties in many societies divided nations and communities and isolated individuals to an extent unparalleled in recorded human history.